Best practice to create typed collections/lists with internal or private Add, Remove functionality? 2
read this question and don't want to read swathes of API docs yet still understand what the intent is. It's also really important to minimize code clutter - so things like ReadOnlyCollection are dubious at best.
GitHub'da bizimle ortaklaşa iş dokuman Bu derunğin kaynağı GitHub'da bulunabilir; burada başkaca sorunları ve çekme isteklerini oluşturup gözden geçirebilirsiniz. Daha fazla vukuf kucakin katkıda kâin kılavuzumuzu inceleyin.
Sum(IEnumerable, Func) Computes the sum of the sequence of Single values that are obtained by invoking a transform function on each element of the input sequence.
A collection that is read-only is simply a collection with a wrapper that prevents modifying the collection; therefore, if changes are made to the underlying collection, the read-only collection reflects those changes.
Also, native collections güç't be enhanced with extra veri. You'll recognize this next time you find that you pass in (Collection, Extra) to more than one or two methods. It indicates that "Extra" belongs with the object containing your collection.
Note also that this makes your mesele particularly nice. If you don't want people changing the collections, your container need contain no mutators. If you decide later that in just one case you actually HAVE to modify it, you gönül create a safe mechanism to do so.
An immutable C# ReadOnlyCollectionBase Nasıl Kullanılır object is defined bey an object that cannot be changed after it has been created. Not all collections are immutable, but you can use the read-only collection types in .
Sum(IEnumerable, Func) Computes the sum of the sequence of nullable C# ReadOnlyCollectionBase Nedir Double values that are obtained by invoking a transform function on each element of the input sequence.
Ayrıca, metotlar projenizin bakımını ve güncellemesini kolaylaştırır ve başarımınızı fazlalıkrabilir. Bu nedenle, C# programlama dilinde metot giymek, bir projeyi daha düzgün ve daha yüksek hale getirmenin önemli bir yoludur.
One possibility is C# ReadOnlyCollectionBase Nedir to implement your own thread-safe variant of the ReadOnlyCollection to allow locked access, though this will be non-trivial and non-performant if you want C# ReadOnlyCollectionBase Temel Özellikleri to support IEnumerable, and it still
However, to be doubly sure, I'd like to return the collection as read-only, so that the calling code is unable C# ReadOnlyCollectionBase Nedir to make changes to the collection, only view what's already there. Is this at all possible?
When you pass around collections instead of writing an object paradigma, entire classes of refactorings will never occur to you.
SkipWhile(IEnumerable, Func) Bypasses elements in a sequence kakım long as a specified condition is true and then returns the remaining elements. The element's index is used in the logic of the predicate function.